Skip to main content

Table 1 Ovarian length and signal intensity in pregnant women undergoing MRI with respect to ovarian appearance, ovarian stimulation and torsion

From: Magnetic resonance imaging performance for diagnosis of ovarian torsion in pregnant women with stimulated ovaries

Final diagnosis

Normal ovaries at time of retrospective review (N = 27 patients, N = 53 ovaries)

Not stimulated, not torsion but in retrospective review asymmetric ovarian edema (N = 3)

Stimulated without torsion (N = 11)

Torsion without stimulation (N = 3)

Torsion with stimulation (N = 3)

PCOS (N = 3) (2 stimulated, 1 non-stimulated)

Greatest ovarian diameter (cm)

3.2 +/− 0.6 (2.1–4.8)

4.5 +/− 0.6 (3.8–4.9)

7.6 +/− 2.8 (4.5–13.4)

5.6 +/− 0.9 (4.6–6.2)

6 +/− 1.5 (4.7–7.7)

8.8 +/− 4.8 (5.2–14.2)

Contralateral greatest ovarian diameter (cm)

2.5 +/− 0.6 (1.4–3.5)

3.1 +/− 0.3 (2.8–3.4)

5.4 +/− 1.2 (3.6–7.1)

3.7 +/− 1.1 (2.7–4.9)

3.9 +/− 1.7 (2.7–5.8)

6.1 +/− 2.4 (4.6–8.9)

Average difference in ovarian greatest diameter

0.6 +/− 0.5 (0–2.2)

1.3 +/− 0.8 (0.4–1.9)

2.2 +/− 2.4 (0.1–7.1)

2.6 +/− 1.3 (1.1–3.3)

2.1 +/− 0.3 (1.9–2.5)

2.7 +/− 2.4 (0.6–5.3)

Average % difference in ovarian greatest diameter

0.19 +/− 0.13 (0–0.51)

0.29 +/− 0.16 (0.11–0.4)

0.24 +/− 0.19 (0.02–0.63)

0.33 +/− 0.19 (0.21–0.55)

0.37 +/− 0.11 (0.25–0.44)

0.26 +/− 0.13 (0.12–0.37)

T1WI signal difference

0

1 (33%)

2 (18%)

0

1 (33%)

1 (33%) – T1 not available for 1 patient

T2WI signal difference

3 (12%)

3 (100%)

1 (9%)

2 (67%)

2 (67%)

1 (33%)

FS T2WI signal difference

3 (12%)

3 (100%)

1 (9%) – FS T2WI not available for one patient

2 (67%) – FS T2WI not available for one patient

2 (67%)

1 (33%) – FS T2WI not available for one patient

  1. *Ovarian length data for individual examinations are given in the appendix table