Skip to content


  • Case report
  • Open Access

Diagnosis and management of a heterotopic pregnancy and ruptured rudimentary uterine horn

Fertility Research and Practice20184:6

  • Received: 20 June 2018
  • Accepted: 17 September 2018
  • Published:



Heterotopic pregnancies implanted in a rudimentary uterine horn account for 1 in 2–3 million gestations, and confer significant risk of morbidity due to uterine rupture and hemorrhage.

Case presentation

A 34-year-old nullipara presented with acute pelvic pain at 17 weeks of gestation with dichorionic-diamniotic twins, one in each horn of an anomalous uterus first diagnosed in pregnancy as bicornuate. Three-dimensional ultrasound and MRI revealed myometrial disruption in the left rudimentary uterine horn, and the patient underwent an uncomplicated abdominal hemi-hysterectomy. Fourteen days later, an uncomplicated dilation and curettage was performed for a fetal anomaly in the remaining twin in the right unicornuate uterus.


This case demonstrates the utility of magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of myometrial integrity in a gravid patient with a heterotopic pregnancy and ruptured rudimentary uterine horn. This case demonstrates the importance of pre-pregnancy diagnosis and management of mullerian anomalies.


  • Heterotopic pregnancy
  • Mullerian anomaly
  • Unicornuate uterus
  • Uterine rupture
  • Three-dimensional ultrasound


Mullerian anomalies occur in up to 4% of women, but may be asymptomatic and go undetected [1]. Unicornuate uteri account for just 5% of these anomalies, or 1 in 4,000 women [1]. Most unicornuate uteri (83%) are accompanied by rudimentary horns, most of which are non-communicating [2]. In current practice, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and three-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound are the optimal noninvasive imaging modalities for diagnosis of mullerian anomalies; nonetheless misdiagnosis of a rudimentary horn is not uncommon [1, 3].

Pregnancy outcomes vary with the type of mullerian anomaly; gestations implanted in rudimentary uterine horns—accounting for 1 in 100,000 to 140,000 pregnancies—are associated with particularly high risk of morbidity [1, 3]. Eighty percent or more of gravid rudimentary uterine horns will rupture (usually before 24 weeks of gestation), resulting in hemorrhage and requiring emergency surgery, with a 0.5% maternal mortality rate [3, 4].

Heterotopic pregnancies involving two uterine cavities—one fetus in the rudimentary horn and one in the accompanying unicornuate uterus—account for just 5% of pregnancies implanted in rudimentary uterine horns [4]. These pregnancies occur at a rate of 1 in 2–3 million pregnancies. This obstetrical complication has been reported rarely in the past 20 years (likely due to the advancement of imaging technologies), and without MRI and 3-D ultrasound imaging [57].

Case presentation

The patient is a 34 year old healthy primigravida with spontaneous dichorionic diamniotic twins and likely bicornuate uterus, with one fetus in each horn, initially diagnosed at 12 weeks gestation by two-dimensional ultrasound. Magnetic resonance imaging at that time reported bicornuate unicollis uterine anatomy, with symmetrical myometrial thickness in both horns. The left cervical canal was noted to communicate with the right lower uterine segment and not directly with the vagina. A thin amniotic band was noted in the superior left uterine horn. Bilateral normal maternal kidneys were noted.

The patient subsequently presented at 17 weeks gestation with new onset significant pelvic pain. An MRI at an outside hospital demonstrated a thin myometrial wall (thickness not reported) in the left uterine horn without myometrial disruption, but with moderate pelvic free fluid (Fig. 1). The patient’s hematocrit was noted to decline from 32 to 26%, and she was transferred to our tertiary care center for further management. Three-dimensional ultrasound at our institution revealed two separate uterine cavities, each with a live appropriately-grown fetus with normal amniotic fluid. The anatomy of the cervices was difficult to delineate, but a vascular connection was noted between the medial surfaces of each horn. The myometrium over the left horn was noted to be “markedly thinned” superiorly (Fig. 2). Moderate hemoperitoneum was documented, with a 3.6 cm clot adherent to the thinnest portion of the myometrium of the left horn. Concern was raised for rupture of a rudimentary uterine horn. A severe cardiac anomaly was incidentally diagnosed in the fetus in the right unicornuate uterine horn.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

T2-weighted pelvic MRI at 17 weeks gestational age, with thin left uterine horn myometrial thickness (indicated with a white arrow), with a known amniotic band

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Three-dimensional ultrasound revealing the fetuses in the right (R) and left (L) horns. The thinned myometrial wall is indicated with the white arrow

Given these imaging findings and the patient’s ongoing pain, the decision was made to proceed with diagnostic laparoscopy and left hemi-hysterectomy with fetus in situ. The patient underwent ultrasound-guided selective reduction of the fetus in the left uterine horn using intracardiac potassium chloride. Immediately after this procedure, the patient underwent laparoscopy, at which point she was noted to have a right unicornuate uterus with a rudimentary left uterine horn, with 2 cm rupture on the superior surface with amnion protruding (Fig. 3), and moderate hemoperitoneum. Due to intraoperative bleeding and suspected amniotic rupture during examination of the left horn, the procedure was converted to an abdominal hemi-hysterectomy. During this procedure, a fibrous but narrow band was noted between the uterine horns, which was ligated and transected using bipolar energy. The procedure and the patient’s recovery were uncomplicated.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

a Intraoperative photograph of rupture of the left uterine horn (indicated with an arrow). b Photo of excised rudimentary left uterine horn, with two rupture sites indicated with arrows

The pregnancy in the right uterine horn continued postoperatively. At 19 weeks of gestational age, in the setting of a severe fetal cardiac anomaly and high likelihood of preterm delivery complicating surgical correction, the patient underwent laminaria placement and uncomplicated ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage of the right uterine horn.

The patient subsequently spontaneously conceived two singleton pregnancies. Normal anatomical surveys and fetal echocardiograms were noted in each. Both pregnancies were complicated by preterm contractions without cervical change. Eighteen months after her surgery, the patient delivered a healthy, small for gestational age (2,580 g) female infant, followed by a healthy 2,722 g male the following year.

Discussion and conclusions

Pregnancies implanted in rudimentary uterine horns, though rare, confer significant risk of morbidity and mortality due to uterine rupture and hemorrhage. Heterotopic gestations involving a rudimentary horn (as this patient had) have been reported rarely in the English language literature in the past 20 years, likely due to radiologic advancements allowing for diagnosis prior to pregnancy or gravid rupture [35]. None of these reports have included images from MRI and 3-D ultrasound, which are the preferred imaging modalities. These modalities perform similarly for the diagnosis of mullerian anomalies, with sensitivity and specificity of 83–100% [1, 3, 8]. Both modalities are not necessary in every patient with a mullerian anomaly, but given the technical difficulty of diagnosing a rudimentary horn in pregnancy and the obstetrical ramifications, our team chose to collect as much information as possible by performing both in this case.

MRI and 3-D ultrasound are the mainstays of diagnosis of mullerian anomalies, as traditional ultrasound has poor sensitivity (26%) for the diagnosis of a rudimentary horn in both gravid and non-gravid patients [9]. In pregnancy, the distorted uterine anatomy further complicates radiologic assessment of mullerian anomalies. The contour of the uterine fundus, vital to differentiating between a bicornuate uterus from uterine didelphys or unicornuate uterus with rudimentary horn, is obscured when the cavities are distended by advancing pregnancy [3, 9]. Vascular pedicles between the horns, and asymmetrical sizes and/or myometrial thickness of the uterine horns are clues to the diagnosis of a rudimentary horn in pregnancy by MRI or ultrasound, as were identified in this case [3]. Accurate pregestational diagnosis of a rudimentary uterine horn may also require hysterosalpingogram or hysteroscopy (not possible in pregnancy), and/or laparoscopy [3].

This case demonstrates the consequences of an undiagnosed rudimentary uterine horn in pregnancy, and the importance of identifying mullerian anomalies before pregnancy. Many rudimentary horns, however, are undiagnosed prior to pregnancy or may be misdiagnosed, particularly when the myometrium appears symmetrical [1, 3]. When identified prior to pregnancy, rudimentary horns with functional endometrium should be surgically removed to relieve obstruction-related pain when present, and to prevent obstetrical complications [1, 3, 9]. Whether the rudimentary horn communicates with the uterine cavity is irrelevant, as ectopic pregnancies can occur in non-communicating rudimentary horns [3].

In patients with mullerian anomalies diagnosed in pregnancy, particularly those who develop pain, a high index of suspicion should be maintained for a rudimentary uterine horn and possible rupture. Upon diagnosis of pregnancy in a rudimentary horn, immediate surgical management is recommended, though rare late diagnoses and live births (usually preterm) have been reported [2, 3, 9]. Surgeons may use imaging findings—including uterine horn size, evidence of uterine rupture and/or invasive placenta—to plan a surgical approach (laparoscopy versus laparotomy) and prepare for hemorrhage [10]. In patients with the even rarer clinical complication of a heterotopic pregnancy involving a rudimentary horn, surgical management in pregnancy with preservation of the unicornuate uterine gestation is possible, as demonstrated in this case. While the ongoing unicornuate uterine gestations in these cases are subject to the complications associated with this anomaly (pregnancy loss and preterm birth), live births at 36–37 weeks have been described [6, 7].


Availability of data and materials

The data generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available to protect patient confidentiality but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

PB prepared the manuscript, with edits from all of the authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

As this was a case report, Institutional Review Board approval was not required.

Consent for publication

The patient gave her written consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Division of Global and Community Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elliot Hospital, Manchester, NH 03103, USA


  1. Reichman D, Laufer MR, Robinson BK. Pregnancy outcomes in unicornuate uteri: a review. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1886–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Heinonen PK. Unicornuate uterus and rudimentary horn. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:224–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Siwatch S, Mehra R, Pandher DK, Huria A. Rudimentary horn pregnancy: a 10-year experience and review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:687–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Nahum GG. Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. The 20th-century worldwide experience of 588 cases. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:151–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sahakian V. Rupture of a rudimentary horn pregnancy with a combined intrauterine pregnancy: a case report. J Reprod Med. 1992;37:283–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gagnon AL, Galerneau F, Williams K. Twin pregnancy with one foetus in a rudimentary horn: a case report of a surviving twin. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;105:1326–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lallar M, Nandal R, Sharma D. Unruptured rudimentary horn pregnancy presenting with acute haemoperitoneum with combined intrauterine pregnancy: a case report. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015;13:49–52.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Graupera B, Pascual MA, Hereter L, Browne JL, Úbeda B, Rodríguez I, Pedrero C. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:616–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Jayasinghe Y, Rane A, Stalewski H, Grover S. The presentation and early diagnosis of the rudimentary uterine horn. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1456–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Contreras KR, Rothenberg JM, Kominiarek MA, Raff GJ. Hand-assisted laparoscopic management of a midtrimester rudimentary horn pregnancy with placenta increta: a case report and literature review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:644–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2018