Skip to main content

The prevalence of depression symptoms among infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis



Infertile women’s mental health problems, including depression, are key fertility health issues that affect infertile women more severely than infertile men. Depression may threaten the health of individuals and reduce the quality of their lives. Considering the role and impact of depression on responses to infertility treatments, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the prevalence of depression symptoms among infertile women.


International databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences, Scopus, Embase, and PsycINFO), national databases (SID and Magiran), and Google Scholar were searched by two independent reviewers for articles published from 2000 to April 5, 2020. The search procedure was performed in both Persian and English using keywords such as “depression,” “disorders,” “infertility,” “prevalence,” and “epidemiology.” The articles were evaluated in terms of their titles, abstracts, and full texts. The reviewers evaluated the quality of the articles using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, after which they analyzed the findings using STATA version 14. The I2 and Egger’s tests were performed to examine heterogeneity and publication bias, respectively.


Thirty-two articles were subjected to the meta-analysis, and a random effects model was used in the examination given the heterogeneity of the articles. The samples in the reviewed studies encompassed a total of 9679 infertile women. The lowest and highest pooled prevalence rates were 21.01% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.61–34.42), as determined using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and 52.21% (95% CI: 43.51–60.91), as ascertained using the Beck Depression Inventory, respectively. The pooled prevalence values of depression among infertile women were 44.32% (95% CI: 35.65–52.99) in low- and middle-income countries and 28.03% (95% CI: 19.61–36.44) in high-income countries.


The prevalence of depression among infertile women was higher than that among the general population of a given country. Especially in low- and middle-income countries, appropriate measures, planning, and policy that target the negative effects of depression on infertile women’s lives should be established to reduce related problems.


Infertility is defined as the inability to achieve pregnancy after one year of unprotected intercourse [1]. This condition affects about 10 to 12% of couples worldwide [2], but the percentage is higher (about 31.1%) in low- and middle-income countries [3]. Among women, 1.9% experience primary infertility, and 10.5% grapple with secondary infertility [4]. Infertility is caused by many factors, ranging from female- and male-related determinants separately to a combination of factors; sometimes, the condition is prompted by no cause [5].

Being one of the main problems in reproductive health, infertility is a matter of serious concern for the World Health Organization (WHO). The organization stated that the disregard of infertility in different countries poses widespread psychological problems at individual and social levels [6]. Unfortunately, many nations pay insufficient attention to this condition, thereby resulting in devastating effects that not only prevent individuals from having children but also diminish their health and quality of life [7].

In many developing and developed societies, a woman is considered a complete individual only when she becomes a mother [8]. This perspective leads to inequality between men and women as well as gender discrimination [9]. Additionally, the majority of reproduction medications and treatments are performed on women, causing them considerable discomfort, feelings of sickness, and disability [10]. Many women’s infertility is also accompanied with extensive psychological changes, such as depression [11], which is followed by social isolation and low self-esteem [12], although a number of women cope with infertility and have positive and meaningful lives [13]. The thoughts that infertile women entertain about pregnancy may give rise to depression, anxiety, and stress in such a way that depression levels resemble those experienced by women with cancer [14]. These problems inevitably affect their quality of life, with some afflicted females even contemplating suicide and death given widespread social pressures in addition to depression [15].

Despite the high prevalence of infertility, however, most women do not share their problems with their families and friends, thus precluding the acquisition of social support [16]. Infertility as well as the resultant social stigma [9], fear of loneliness in the future [17], fear of divorce [18], and unpredictable treatment processes are critical factors in the development of depression among this group of women [19]. Other issues that are contributory to depression are frequent visits to doctors and medications. All these factors, in turn, affect the responses of women to infertility treatments, their health statuses, and their quality of life [20, 21]. Another issue that needs consideration is the fact that the prevalence of depression in infertile couples differs by country [22]. Nevertheless, most studies reported that infertile women experience higher levels of depression than do infertile men [23]. In Naab et al.’s [24] study, for example, depression prevails at a rate of 11%, but in the works of Crawford et al. [25], Pinar et al. [26], and Haririan et al. [27], prevalence occurs at percentages of 41, 65, and 85%, respectively.

The above-mentioned studies provided valuable insights, but no study has been devoted specifically to a meta-analysis of the prevalence of depression among infertile women. Because the sample sizes in some studies are small, the findings that they derive cannot be used as basis for decision making and policymaking at the macro level [28]. This deficiency can be addressed by supplementing research with meta-analyses as these examinations are primary sources of credible evidence for medical staff, physicians, and policymakers. Correspondingly, the present study conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis to examine the prevalence of depression symptoms among females afflicted with infertility.


Search strategy

The results of this work are reported on the basis of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). International databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and PsycINFO), national databases (SID and Magiran), and Google Scholar were searched by two independent reviewers for articles published from 2000 to April 5, 2020. The search procedure was performed in both Persian and English using keywords such as “depression,” “disorders,” “infertility,” “prevalence,” and “epidemiology.” The keywords were combined using AND and OR operators (Additional file 1: Search Strategy).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows:

■ Cross-sectional studies and longitudinal studies using cross-sectional data

■ Research that used valid methods of assessing depression symptoms (clinical interviews or standard questionnaires)

■ Works with infertile women (those with no pregnancy after one year of unprotected intercourse) and women of reproductive ages (15–49 years) as subjects

■ Studies with a minimum sample of 30 participants

■ Those involving women with no chronic diseases and cancer

The following studies were excluded from the analysis:

■ Case studies

■ Review and animal studies

■ Research on mental syndromes

■ Studies published in languages other than English and Persian

■ Original articles to which access could not be obtained

■ Unrelated reports

Data extraction

The two reviewers separately evaluated article titles and abstracts on the basis of the inclusion criteria to determine which studies could be included in the study. Then, the full texts of prospective articles were reviewed and included in the sample if they satisfied the criteria. The required data were extracted by the trained reviewers independently, and cases of inconsistency and disagreement were resolved by a third reviewer. The information required for the assessment of each article were the names of authors, year of publication, research context (location), sample size, type of tools, type and duration of infertility, average age of women participants, and rate of depression prevalence among infertile women.

Quality evaluation

The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) modified by Zhang et al. [29] was used to assess the quality of the nonrandomized studies subjected to the meta-analysis. The quality of the present research was evaluated using the modified version of the NOS by Zhang et al. [27], which addresses five domains: the representativeness of a sample (Population contained a mixture of specialties at multiple sites or a single specialty at a single site), sample size (200 and greater than 200 participants or less than 200), non-respondents (Comparability between respondent and non-respondent characteristics was established, and the response rate was satisfactory), the ascertainment of anxiety (Validated measurement tool using a validated cutoff score or clinical interview), and the quality of descriptive statistics reporting Reported descriptive statistics to describe the population (e.g., age, sex) with proper measures of anxiety (e.g., standard deviation, standard error, range, percentage). The items in each section are scored from 0 to 1; hence, the minimum and maximum scores that can be obtained are 0 and 5, respectively. The studies were classified into those involving low- and high-risk groups on the basis of their NOS scores (≤3 and > 3, respectively) [27]. As with the data extraction, the quality of the articles was evaluated by the two independent reviewers, and inconsistency and disagreement were resolved by a third reviewer. The results of the quality evaluation are presented in Additional file 2. The coefficient of agreement between the reviewers was K = 0.85.

Outcome measures

The main outcome of interest in the current research was the presence of depression symptoms among the infertile women. In the studies examined, standard instruments, namely, interviews and questionnaires, were administered to the participants to determine symptoms and identify the prevalence of depression among this population.

Statistical analysis

The I2 test was carried out to assess heterogeneity, which manifests in three forms: low (25%), moderate (50%), and high (75%) heterogeneity. A random effects model was adopted in cases wherein heterogeneity was > 50% [30]. The causes of heterogeneity were explored on the grounds of meta-regression, duration of infertility, and sample size. Egger’s test was run to evaluate publication bias, with subgroup analysis performed on the basis of the types of tools used in the studies and the World Bank’s classification of countries by income. The collected data were analyzed using STATA version 14. A P-value of 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance.


Figure 1 shows details regarding the article selection. As can be observed, 2250 articles were found in the initial search. After duplicates were excluded, the titles and abstracts of the remaining articles were reviewed. Finally, the full texts of 203 papers were examined, after which a final sample of 32 studies were subjected to the meta-analysis.

Fig. 1

Flowchart of the selection of studies

One study each was conducted in Sweden, India, Iraq, Vietnam, Italy, Poland, Turkey, Malaysia, Tunisia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Hungary; two each were carried out in Norway, Ghana, and the US; three were performed in Nigeria; four were conducted in China; and seven studies were carried out in Iran. Among the studies, 23 studies were carried out in low- and middle-income countries, whereas nine were performed in high-income nations. To determine depression symptoms, the researchers used different instruments, such as the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) (one study), International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (ICD-10) (one study), National Institutes of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement (NIH-PROMS) (one study), Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (two studies), Patient Health Questionnaire (two studies), the 10-item Center of Epidemiologic Studies Short Depression Scale (CES-D10) (two studies), Zung Depression Scale (ZDS) (four studies), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (seven studies), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (12 studies).

Overall, the sample sizes used in the studies amounted to 9679 infertile women, with the minimum and maximum samples being 30 and 1413 participants, respectively. The prevalence of depression in the studies ranged from 6.4% (Norway) to 85% (Iran). Table 1 presents the information extracted from the examined studies.

Table 1 Characteristics of the studies selected for the meta-analysis

Evaluation of heterogeneity and meta-analysis

The results of the I2 test revealed the presence of heterogeneity in the studies (I2 = 97.92), hence requiring the use of the random effects model. With regard to the considerable variety of instruments used to measure depression in the infertile women, a subgroup analysis was run to investigate the prevalence of the condition in this population. The studies using MINI, ICD-10, NIH-PROMS, and CES-D10 were classified under the interview subgroup, and the studies wherein other instruments were employed were also categorized in their own subgroups. Accordingly, six subgroups were defined, whose analysis results revealed that the lowest pooled prevalence rate of depression was 21.01% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.61–34.42), as determined using the HADS, and that the highest pooled prevalence rate of depression was 52.21% (95% CI: 43.51–60.91), as ascertained using the BDI. Furthermore, the lowest prevalence rate was 6.4% (95% CI: 5.12–7.68), derived in Rostad et al.’s study [35] in Norway, whereas the highest prevalence rate was 85.00% (95% CI: 78.00–92.00), reported in Haririan’s study [25] in Iran (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Forest plot of the pooled prevalence of depression among infertile women

Publication Bias

The results of Egger’s tests for prevalence were statistically significant (p = 0.001). It means for prevalence, the results of the Egger’s test indicating that there is publication bias (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Egger’s tests for publication bias plot


Two variables were included in a univariate meta-regression as covariances to investigate the causes of heterogeneity. The results indicated that sample size (P = 0.342) and duration of infertility (P = 0.542) were the main reasons for the heterogeneity in the prevalence of depression among the infertile women.

Subgroup analysis

A review of the articles indicated a lower prevalence of depression in the studies that administered clinical interviews than in the research that employed questionnaires. The subgroup analysis performed to compare these studies showed that the interview-studies found a pooled prevalence of 33.90% (95% CI: 14.961–52.85), whereas the questionnaire-based studies found such prevalence to be 40.39% (95% CI: 33.35–48.42) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Forest plot of the pooled prevalence of depression among infertile women (interview and questionnaire subgroups)

The review of the texts reflected that the prevalence of depression among the infertile women was higher in low- and middle-income countries than in high-income countries. The World Bank divides countries into these two subgroups. The results indicated that the pooled prevalence of depression among the infertile women in low- and middle-income countries was 44.32% (95% CI: 35.65–52.99), whereas that of the infertile women in high-income countries was 28.03% (95% CI: 19.61–36.44) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5

Forest plot of the pooled prevalence of depression among infertile women (income level of different countries)


This study investigated the prevalence of depression among infertile women via a systematic review and a meta-analysis. The highest pooled prevalence of depression was 52.21% (95% CI: 43.51–60.91) and was detected using the BDI, whereas the lowest was 21.01% (95% CI: 15.61–34.42) and was found using the HADS. Prevalence in the infertile women was higher than that in the general population. The WHO estimated the global prevalence of depression at 4.4% [31]. In a systematic study on the global prevalence of common mental disorders from 1980 to 2013, the pooled prevalence of these conditions was 29.2% (95% CI, 25.9–32.6%) [32]. Depression is one of the most common problems to which individuals are exposed as they encounter life’s difficulties and illnesses. This disorder may cause disability and reduce quality of life among individuals [33]. In most parts of the world, childbearing is equivalent to femininity so that women feel extreme sadness and failure in life when they fail to become mothers; their inability to conceive then triggers depression [34]. In comparison with the general population, infertile women face many social and family problems that are brought on by their condition, such as high treatment costs, social stigma, frequent doctor visits, and many medications and tests; these factors also contribute to depression [35].

The lowest and highest prevalence rates indicated that depression is more widespread among infertile women than in pregnant and postpartum women. In a systematic review, Sawyer et al. [36] showed that the prevalence of depression in pregnant women ranged from 4.3 to 17.4%. A 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis reflected that the prevalence of depression in postpartum women was 17% (95% CI 0.15–0.20) [37]. Childbearing and parenting are the important roles of women in many societies [38]; hence, their inability to conceive translates to a failure to achieve one of their main goals in life. This realization may lead to depression [39].

The present study uncovered a prevalence of 39.78% (95% CI: 32.82–46.74) among infertile women. In Yang et al.’s [40] study, the prevalence of depression among infertile men was 20.8% [56], but the WHO reported prevalence rates of 5.1 and 3.6% among women and men worldwide [31]. Women are confronted with many problems as they deal with infertility, and these problems play a role in the development of depression [19]. Some of these problems are caused by fear of the future, fear of experiencing divorce, loneliness, and rejection by others [38].

The studies subjected to this meta-analysis reported prevalence levels that ranged from 6.4 to 85%. For instance, Chiaffarino et al. [41] and Joelsson et al. [42] reported prevalence rates of 17.9 and 15.7% in Italy and Sweden, respectively, while Al-Asadi and Hussein [43] and Haririan et al. [27] discovered prevalence rates of 68.90 and 85% in Iraq and Iran, respectively. The inconsistencies in the findings seem to have been caused by the variances in income levels across the countries. On this basis, the subgroup analysis was performed with country income as reference. The results, which were grounded in the World Bank’s classification of countries, indicated prevalence levels of 44.32% among the infertile women in low- and middle-income countries (95% CI: 35.65–52.99) and 28.03% (95% CI: 19.61–36.44) among such a population in high-income countries. Depression is the seventh leading cause of disease burden in low- and middle-income countries [19] because in such contexts, health care and appropriate tools for screening individuals in terms of mental health are insufficient [44]. These problems are exacerbated by the fact that treatment costs are paid out of pocket and expenses related to health care are excessive [45]. Depression may also stem from the economic particularities of the majority of low- and middle-income countries, where women are unemployed, and their husbands pay for infertility treatments [46]. Moreover, infertility treatments require frequent referrals and treatments, yet despite all the efforts made by individuals and treatment staff, treatment outcomes remain unpredictable [47]. In these nations, as well, infertile women receive low family and social support [46], whereas in high-income countries, emphasis is placed on prevention and mental health programs, with governments allocating funding for these purposes [48]. The WHO and the 1994 Cairo Conference on Population and Development addressed infertility as an important problem in the field of reproductive health. This condition should be of great concern for different countries, especially those belonging to the low- and middle-income brackets [49].

A meta-analysis by Frederiksen et al. [50] indicated that psychological interventions for reducing depression among infertile women would result in the greater success of infertility treatments and higher rates of pregnancy. Depression is assumed as a negative influence on mental health and, consequently, physical and social health [51]. The provision of supportive services and psychological counseling intended to help women manage and cope with infertility would effectively minimize the prevalence of depression among this group [52].

One of the limitations of this study was the adoption of various tools in evaluating the prevalence of depression among infertile women as none of the tools were developed and validated specifically for this population. Another limitation is that the study reported the means and standard deviations of the scores obtained from the depression assessment tools as these values could not be used to calculate prevalence in some of the studies.


The results of the meta-analysis indicated a higher prevalence of depression among infertile women than among the general population, pregnant women, and men. Given that depression and disregard of this problem severely affect responses to treatment, resolving this issue requires further attention as well as careful planning and government involvement, especially in low-income countries.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



World Health Organization


The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses


Newcastle–Ottawa Scale


Not reported


Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview


Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale


Confidence Interval


Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale


International Classification of Disease


Beck depression inventory


Depression Anxiety Stress Scales


The Patient Health Questionnaire


Center of Epidemiologic Studies Short Depression Scale


The National Institutes of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System


Standard Deviation


  1. 1.

    Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility: lippincott Williams & wilkins; 2012.

  2. 2.

    Maroufizadeh S, Ghaheri A, Almasi-Hashiani A, Mohammadi M, Navid B, Ezabadi Z, et al. The prevalence of anxiety and depression among people with infertility referring to Royan Institute in Tehran, Iran: a cross-sectional questionnaire study. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2018;23(2):103–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Polis CB, Cox CM, Tunçalp Ö, McLain AC, Thoma ME. Estimating infertility prevalence in low-to-middle-income countries: an application of a current duration approach to demographic and health survey data. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(5):1064–74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Melodie V, Christine W. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem. 2018.

  6. 6.

    Organization WH. Infertility is a global public health issue. WHO) 2014. Accessed 1 Sept 2020.

  7. 7.

    Ogawa M, Takamatsu K, Horiguchi F. Evaluation of factors associated with the anxiety and depression of female infertility patients. BioPsychoSocial Med. 2011;5(1):15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hawkey AJ, Ussher JM, Perz J. “If you Don’t have a baby, you Can’t be in our culture”: migrant and refugee Women’s experiences and constructions of fertility and fertility control. Womens Reprod Health. 2018;5(2):75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hasanpoor-Azghdy SB, Simbar M, Vedadhir A. The social consequences of infertility among Iranian women: a qualitative study. Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;8(4):409.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Herbert DL, Lucke JC, Dobson AJ. Depression: an emotional obstacle to seeking medical advice for infertility. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(5):1817–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ying LY, Wu LH, Loke AY. Gender differences in experiences with and adjustments to infertility: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(10):1640–52.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Behboodi-Moghadam Z, Salsali M, Eeftekhar-Ardbily H, Vaismoradi M, Ramezanzadeh F. Experiences of infertility through the lens of Iranian infertile women: a qualitative study. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2013;10(1):41–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kiani Z, Simbar M, Hajian S, Zayeri F. Quality of life among infertile women living in a paradox of concerns and dealing strategies: a qualitative study. Nursing Open. 2021;8(1):251–61.

  14. 14.

    Bokaie M, Simbar M, Ardekani SMY. Sexual behavior of infertile women: a qualitative study. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015;13(10):645.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Umezulike A, Efetie E. The psychological trauma of infertility in Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;84(2):178–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rooney KL, Domar AD. The relationship between stress and infertility. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018;20(1):41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gerrits T, Van Rooij F, Esho T, Ndegwa W, Goossens J, Bilajbegovic A, et al. Infertility in the Global South: Raising awareness and generating insights for policy and practice. Facts Views Vision ObGyn. 2017;9(1):39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Fahami F, Hoseini Quchani S, Ehsanpour S, Zargham A. Women’s lived experiences of female infertility. Iran J Obstetrics Gynecol Infertil. 2010;13(4):45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Maroufizadeh S, Karimi E, Vesali S, Samani RO. Anxiety and depression after failure of assisted reproductive treatment among patients experiencing infertility. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;130(3):253–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ramezanzadeh F, Aghssa MM, Abedinia N, Zayeri F, Khanafshar N, Shariat M, et al. A survey of relationship between anxiety, depression and duration of infertility. BMC Womens Health. 2004;4(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hashemi S, Simbar M, Ramezani-Tehrani F, Shams J, Majd HA. Anxiety and success of in vitro fertilization. Eur J Obstetrics Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;164(1):60–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    El Kissi Y, Romdhane AB, Hidar S, Bannour S, Idrissi KA, Khairi H, et al. General psychopathology, anxiety, depression and self-esteem in couples undergoing infertility treatment: a comparative study between men and women. Eur J Obstetrics Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;167(2):185–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zivaridelavar M, Kazemi A, Kheirabadi GR. The effect of assisted reproduction treatment on mental health in fertile women. J Educ Health Promot. 2016;5(2):15–20.

  24. 24.

    Naab F, Brown R, Heidrich S. Psychosocial health of infertile Ghanaian women and their infertility beliefs. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2013;45(2):132–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Crawford NM, Hoff HS, Mersereau JE. Infertile women who screen positive for depression are less likely to initiate fertility treatments. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(3):582–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pinar G, Zeyneloglu HB. Quality of life, anxiety and depression in turkish women prior to receiving assisted reproductive techniques. Int J Fertil Steril. 2012;6(1):1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Haririan HR, Mohammadpour Y, Aghajanloo A. Prevalence of depression and contributing factors of depression in the infertile women referred to Kosar infertility center, 2009. Iran J Obstetrics Gynecol Infertil. 2010;13(2):45–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Haidich A-B. Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia. 2010;14(Suppl 1):29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhang L, Fu T, Yin R, Zhang Q, Shen B. Prevalence of depression and anxiety in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Alosaimi FD, Altuwirqi MH, Bukhari M, Abotalib Z, BinSaleh S. Psychiatric disorders among infertile men and women attending three infertility clinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2015;35(5):359.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Joelsson LS, Tydén T, Wanggren K, Georgakis M, Stern J, Berglund A, et al. Anxiety and depression symptoms among sub-fertile women, women pregnant after infertility treatment, and naturally pregnant women. Eur Psychiatry. 2017;45:212–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lakatos E, Szigeti JF, Ujma PP, Sexty R, Balog P. Anxiety and depression among infertile women: a cross-sectional survey from Hungary. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17(1):48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Yusuf L. Depression, anxiety and stress among female patients of infertility; a case control study. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2016;32(6):1340.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Biringer E, Howard LM, Kessler U, Stewart R, Mykletun A. Is infertility really associated with higher levels of mental distress in the female population? Results from the north-Trøndelag health study and the medical birth registry of Norway. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2015;36(2):38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Upkong D, Orgi E. Mental health of infertile women in Nigeria; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Rostad B, Schmidt L, Sundby J, Schei B. Infertility experience and health differentials–a population-based comparative study on infertile and non-infertile women (the HUNT study). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(8):757–64.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Verma P, Rastogi R, Sachdeva S, Gandhi R, Kapoor R, Sachdeva S. Psychiatric morbidity in infertility patients in a tertiary care setup. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(9):VC01.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kalkhoran LF, Bahrami H, Farrokhi NA, Zeraati H, Tarahomi M. Comparing anxiety, depression and sexual life satisfaction in two groups of fertile and infertile women in Tehran. J Reprod Infertil. 2011;12(2).

  40. 40.

    Peyvandi S, Hosseini H, Daneshpour M, Mohammadpour R, Golami N. Frequency of depression, anxiety and marital satisfaction Related Factors in Infertile Women Referring to Centers Infertility in Sari city. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2009;20(80):26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sulyman D, Ayanda KA, Aminu BM, Dattijo L. Anxiety and depressive disorders among infertile women attending clinic in a Nigeria teaching hospital. Afr J Biomed Res. 2019;22(2):157–65.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Vo TM, Tran QT, Le CV, Do TT, Le TM. Depression and associated factors among infertile women at Tu Du hospital, Vietnam: a cross-sectional study. Int J Womens Health. 2019;11:343.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Oladeji S, OlaOlorun A. Depression among infertile women in Ogbomosoland. S Afr Fam Pract. 2018;60(2):41–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Al-Asadi JN, Hussein ZB. Depression among infertile women in Basrah, Iraq: prevalence and risk factors. J Chinese Med Assoc. 2015;78(11):673–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Alhassan A, Ziblim AR, Muntaka S. A survey on depression among infertile women in Ghana. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14(1):42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Chiaffarino F, Baldini MP, Scarduelli C, Bommarito F, Ambrosio S, D’Orsi C, et al. Prevalence and incidence of depressive and anxious symptoms in couples undergoing assisted reproductive treatment in an Italian infertility department. Eur J Obstetrics Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;158(2):235–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Drosdzol A, Skrzypulec V. Depression and anxiety among polish infertile couples–an evaluative prevalence study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2009;30(1):11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ma F, Cao H, Song L, Liao X, Liu X. Study on risk factors for depression in female infertile patients and evaluation of efficacy of psychological nursing intervention. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2018;11(4):4030–8.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wu G, Yin T, Yang J, Xu W, Zou Y, Wang Y, et al. Depression and coping strategies of Chinese women undergoing in-vitro fertilization. Eur J Obstetrics Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;183:155–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Psaros C, Kagan L, Auba E, Alert M, Park ER. A brief report of depressive symptoms and health promoting behaviors among women with infertility attending a clinical mind-body program. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2012;33(1):32–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Li H, Lei J, Xu F, Yan C, Guimerans M, Xing H, et al. A study of sociocultural factors on depression in Chinese infertile women from Hunan Province. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2017;38(1):12–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Khademi A, Alleyassin A, Agha-Hosseini M, Ahmadi Abhari A, Esfhandi H, Fakhimi DK. Depression and infertility: evaluation of 681 infertile women using Beck depression inventory. J Hayat. 2004;10(2):13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Jin X, Wang G, Liu S, Zhang J, Zeng F, Qiu Y, et al. Survey of the situation of infertile women seeking in vitro fertilization treatment in China. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013.

  54. 54.

    Khademi A, Alleyassin A, Aghahosseini M, Ramezanzadeh F, Abhari AA. Pretreatment Beck Depression inventory score is an important predictor for post-treatment score in infertile patients: a before-after study. BMC Psychiatry. 2005;5(1):25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Musa R, Ramli R, Yazmie AWA, Khadijah MBS, Hayati MY, Midin M, et al. A preliminary study of the psychological differences in infertile couples and their relation to the coping styles. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55:S65–S9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Hasanpoor-Azghady SB, Simbar M, Abou Ali Vedadhir SAA, Amiri-Farahani L. The social construction of infertility among Iranian infertile women: a qualitative study. J Reprod Infertil. 2019;20(3):178.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors express their gratitude to all the researchers whose articles were analyzed and the Nursing and Midwifery Faculty of the University of Medical Sciences for their support and contribution to this work.


No funding or sponsoring organization was involved in the carrying out of this work.

Author information




ZK and MS, SH and FZ conceived of the study, interpreted the results, and co-wrote the manuscript. ZK, FZ, MS collected the data, helped with data interpretation, and co-wrote the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoumeh Simbar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article was approved by the Midwifery and Reproductive Health Center of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences with the code of ethics IR.SBMU.PHARMACY.REC.1399.219.

Consent for publication

“Not applicable” in this section.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Search Strategy.

Additional file 2.

Quality Assessment.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiani, Z., Simbar, M., Hajian, S. et al. The prevalence of depression symptoms among infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Res and Pract 7, 6 (2021).

Download citation


  • Infertility
  • Women
  • Depression
  • Meta-analysis
  • Prevalence